- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: .
Posted on 10/9/18 at 12:13 pm to ShortyRob
Posted on 10/9/18 at 12:13 pm to ShortyRob
What would make the EC more representative is eliminating the "winner take all" rule in most states. The 2 "senator" votes should go the the winner of the popular vote in that state. The "representative" vote should go to the winner of the popular vote in each Congressional District.
Posted on 10/9/18 at 12:15 pm to Dr Hawkenbush
quote:I'm not averse to examining HOW we accommodate lesser populated regions. The HOW of how we are disparate is different.
What would make the EC more representative is eliminating the "winner take all" rule in most states. The 2 "senator" votes should go the the winner of the popular vote in that state. The "representative" vote should go to the winner of the popular vote in each Congressional District.
But to simply take the view cahoots wants is ignorant in the extreme
Posted on 10/9/18 at 12:30 pm to Dr Hawkenbush
quote:
What would make the EC more representative is eliminating the "winner take all" rule in most states. The 2 "senator" votes should go the the winner of the popular vote in that state. The "representative" vote should go to the winner of the popular vote in each Congressional District.
Nope. You dilute the power of the majority and really just make a popular vote lite system.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News