- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: “That deer was on the decline”
Posted on 12/8/17 at 9:07 am to AlxTgr
Posted on 12/8/17 at 9:07 am to AlxTgr
Why? It cites a 2014 study on deer antler growth, which showed that small antlered bucks remain small. Should you shoot a yearling just because he's a spike? No. But if he's still small at 3.5, pretty safe bet he's not going to get big.
Hell, they tracked those deer from yearling to age 5 in that 2014 study.
The argument being made here is that every study proves that there is no such thing as a cull buck. I'd say that statement is wrong, and that article cites multiple studies that go against that statement.
Hell, they tracked those deer from yearling to age 5 in that 2014 study.
The argument being made here is that every study proves that there is no such thing as a cull buck. I'd say that statement is wrong, and that article cites multiple studies that go against that statement.
This post was edited on 12/8/17 at 9:10 am
Posted on 12/8/17 at 9:27 am to Cowboyfan89
I can remember being a kid and the general consensus among “outdoorsmen” being shoot all the spikes to keep them from breeding.
This post was edited on 12/8/17 at 9:41 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News