Started By
Message

re: “That deer was on the decline”

Posted on 12/8/17 at 9:07 am to
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12745 posts
Posted on 12/8/17 at 9:07 am to
Why? It cites a 2014 study on deer antler growth, which showed that small antlered bucks remain small. Should you shoot a yearling just because he's a spike? No. But if he's still small at 3.5, pretty safe bet he's not going to get big.

Hell, they tracked those deer from yearling to age 5 in that 2014 study.

The argument being made here is that every study proves that there is no such thing as a cull buck. I'd say that statement is wrong, and that article cites multiple studies that go against that statement.
This post was edited on 12/8/17 at 9:10 am
Posted by Jack Daniel
In the bottle
Member since Feb 2013
25647 posts
Posted on 12/8/17 at 9:27 am to
I can remember being a kid and the general consensus among “outdoorsmen” being shoot all the spikes to keep them from breeding.
This post was edited on 12/8/17 at 9:41 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram