- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Politico Opposes Public Access to Information, Says JFK Document Dump Could Be a Fiasco
Posted on 10/21/17 at 9:32 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 10/21/17 at 9:32 am to NC_Tigah
Trump will let them be released. He wants to ensure the truth about Lion Ted's father comes out.
In all seriousness, people are concerned because anyone who reads them will need to understand the context (1963 geopolitics). There is probably a lot of speculation from CIA analysts contained therein that people will construe as absolute fact and irrefutable evidence of a "conspiracy."
I've never believed it was a conspiracy. I think Oswald was just a commie with a gun. He had a history of Soviet sympathy and was a radical according to everyone who knew him. I find it plausible that Oswald had Soviet contacts who might have known of the plot, but I think it's clear Oswald fired the gun.
The conspiracy theorists that believe the CIA killed JFK never provide a cogent reason the CIA would want that done. What did they gain by having Kennedy replaced with Johnson?
In all seriousness, people are concerned because anyone who reads them will need to understand the context (1963 geopolitics). There is probably a lot of speculation from CIA analysts contained therein that people will construe as absolute fact and irrefutable evidence of a "conspiracy."
I've never believed it was a conspiracy. I think Oswald was just a commie with a gun. He had a history of Soviet sympathy and was a radical according to everyone who knew him. I find it plausible that Oswald had Soviet contacts who might have known of the plot, but I think it's clear Oswald fired the gun.
The conspiracy theorists that believe the CIA killed JFK never provide a cogent reason the CIA would want that done. What did they gain by having Kennedy replaced with Johnson?
Posted on 10/21/17 at 1:36 pm to AUstar
quote:
The conspiracy theorists that believe the CIA killed JFK never provide a cogent reason the CIA would want that done. What did they gain by having Kennedy replaced with Johnson?
Marcello is a more likely suspect.
Oswald's shot selection makes sense only if he knew he had a partner on the grassy knoll.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News