Started By
Message
locked post

The New York Times has been sitting on the Harvey Weinstein story since 2004

Posted on 10/8/17 at 8:43 pm
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
66513 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 8:43 pm
They had the story ready to go, but the suits who run the newspaper decided to gut it.

The Wrap
Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
32884 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 8:44 pm to
They're complicit
Posted by MF Doom
I'm only Joshin'
Member since Oct 2008
11717 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 8:44 pm to
Buncha spineless counts
Posted by TOPAL
Member since Mar 2010
4638 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 8:45 pm to
Hypocritical Liberal fricking scum
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
115157 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 8:47 pm to
Since 2004? I'm sick of people saying this is some sort of breaking mind shattering story. I've known about it since 2009 and posted about it with no avail. Sorry, but anyone who could have stopped this needs to go down. It's fricking ridiculous and these people should be destroyed.

Not to mention serial pedophiles like Dan Schneider, who are far worse.

To be honest RollTide, I'm shocked you didn't know about it given how much you love movies.
Posted by Swoopin
Member since Jun 2011
22038 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 8:56 pm to
Jeeze dude you seem to brag about "knowing" in every single thread posted here
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
27165 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 8:56 pm to
Why does everything that is wrong with America always point back to either Matt Damon or ISIS?
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
49782 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 8:57 pm to
WOw maybe they could have saved JLaw from servicing this pig
Posted by IAmReality
Member since Oct 2012
12229 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 8:58 pm to
If this dude was not ultra-left wing, the NYT would have run with this story the second they got any whiff of it.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
141082 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

OMLandshark



quote:

I've known about it since 2009 and posted about it with no avail.


We know bruh... chill
Posted by Calvin Coolidge
Member since Jun 2016
467 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:10 pm to
This is what happens when you have a corrupt dishonest media. No one gets the truth, and people are possibly put at risk.
Posted by 20MuleTeam
West Hartford
Member since Sep 2012
3862 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:11 pm to
How long did the pope sit on child rape?
Posted by ABearsFanNMS
Formerly of tLandmass now in Texas
Member since Oct 2014
18035 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:13 pm to
And we wonder why people distrust the liberal MSM? Can you say Fake News / No News to further their agenda!
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
49876 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:14 pm to
SILENCE EQUALS VIOLENCE

Except when your crimes are not political crimes against the Leftist agenda.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:14 pm to
It's all about money, power and fruitful associations for neoliberals running corporate media. That's why they buried the Harvey story.

Harvey Weinstein must've fricked up something big behind the scenes if the New York Times finally dropped the bomb on him.
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
27165 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:18 pm to
The DNC has been hiring Weinstein for decades to quietly interject its agenda. The NYT's is the equivalent to Weinstein by pushing people-DNC proganda news stories.

It's no coincidence that if you were given a part to act in a Weinstein Co production that you had better donate to DNC causes or face blacklisting.

This is much of a nuclear bomb problem for the DNC as it is for Weinstein.
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36934 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:23 pm to
Shocking
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13651 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

How long did the pope sit on child rape?

How exactly does this relate to the New York Times or Weinstein?

Are you saying all three acted reasonably? Are you supporting sexual malfeasance? Should the FBI check your computer?
Posted by HTDawg
Member since Sep 2016
6683 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 9:55 pm to
Everyone has known about Weinstein's scummy arse, just like the folks at Fox News knew about Ailes and O'Reilly. It's not about politics. It's about power and wealth.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
115157 posts
Posted on 10/8/17 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

Jeeze dude you seem to brag about "knowing" in every single thread posted here


To be honest, the reason I'm saying that is I'm blown away by people either bragging or blown away by this, particularly M/TV posters. It was always exceptionally obvious.

This is really how I feel:

This post was edited on 10/8/17 at 10:23 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram