Started By
Message

re: The Dims Didn't Wait Long - Feinstein to Introuce Bill to Ban Bump Stocks

Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:03 am to
Posted by Jack Bauers HnK
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
5728 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:03 am to
So what would change in this situation? He would have thought to himself “damn, it’s illegal for me to use a bump stock to commit mass murder, guess I’ll find something else to do today”? Or would he have though, “well, I guess mass murder is bad enough, I wouldn’t want to run amiss of Feinstein’s law against bump stocks, better not use them”?
Posted by AUbused
Member since Dec 2013
7771 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:06 am to
Well, to start you wouldnt be able to buy a device that approximates a fully auto weapon down at Cabelas so maybe he doesnt go through the trouble or attempting to acquire one on the black market and tries to aim his shots or spray semi-auto. It seems likely that having that device enabled him to injure/kill more people since, as stated above, the crowd was densely massed making full auto a good choice for max damage. Or maybe he builds a bomb. Who knows.

This obviously wouldnt have stopped him from carrying out the attack.
This post was edited on 10/4/17 at 10:10 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram