Started By
Message

re: Bump/Slide stocks are flying off the shelves

Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:28 pm to
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34372 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

Can you cite your source that shows a yet to be specified limit to rate of fire would reduce casualties in a mass shooting?


This type of nonsensical, obtuse argument is why I chose to be obtuse with the concealed carry statement. Are you really going to act like the high rate of fire this dude achieved didn't have any impact on the number of casualties?
Posted by Propagandalf
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2010
2528 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

I'm not going to spell out the statistics for you. More bullets = more likely strikes when firing into a large crowd. That's the gist of it.


So no evidence, just opinion. Got it.

quote:

This type of nonsensical, obtuse argument is why I chose to be obtuse with the concealed carry statement. Are you really going to act like the high rate of fire this dude achieved didn't have any impact on the number of casualties?


No, I'm asserting that any rate of fire would result in mass casualties in the given instance. That ANY long gun would have still created the same result. But, mostly stating that you are an absolute fool for believing that any gun is inherently "more dangerous" than another because they are inanimate objects, tools, as good or as bad as the hands in which they lie. The shooter had intent to do harm, planned it out, acquired supplies and traveled to carry out his acts. If you think any text written on paper would have stopped him you are wrong. Furthermore, you are a fool for wanting to forfeit your rights out of fear and ignorance.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram