Started By
Message

re: Who has the more diverse, detailed music? Steely Dan vs. Led Zepplin, Beatles, etc

Posted on 10/3/17 at 7:56 am to
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
28348 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 7:56 am to
and there was a lot of stuff borrowed from them too,that most listeners don't even realize.
I don't think Pink Floyd would even exist without The Beatles.

I am not talking about opening doors.I'm talking about borrowing musically.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89750 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 8:19 am to
quote:

I don't think Pink Floyd would even exist without The Beatles.


They were closer to contemporaries than you might think. You see, the origin of a lot of those British acts was the explosion of the blues - a lot of American blues artists starting hitting the UK circuit in the late 1950s and early 1960s - it's obvious when you hear Keith Richards, Syd Barrett, David Gilmour, Robert Plant - and, at times, George Harrison that as much as Scotty Moore and Buddy Holly had influenced them, the Kings, Muddy Waters, etc. Heck, Pink Floyd is a combination of Pink Anderson and Floyd Council - because Barrett had records by those cats in his collection.

quote:

I am not talking about opening doors.I'm talking about borrowing musically.


That certainly happened in the '70s - but I'm not sure Pink Floyd was necessarily doing this - they had gone psychedelic themselves, and appeared to be carving their own path after Barrett imploded.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram