Started By
Message

re: Hard Cold Truths

Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:42 pm to
Posted by keepitrealgoeswrong
Member since Sep 2017
25 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:42 pm to
The question becomes what's the worst you're willing to settle for in order to justify no changes being made? I'm afraid the worst case scenario is 3 loses...that would enable us to have with everyone back doing the same thing next year where we have another 3 loses. I think O is smart and real enough to know it's drastic changes (or adjustments)
Posted by sheek
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Sep 2007
43895 posts
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

Hard Cold Truths by keepitrealgoeswrong The question becomes what's the worst you're willing to settle for in order to justify no changes being made? I'm afraid the worst case scenario is 3 loses...that would enable us to have with everyone back doing the same thing next year where we have another 3 loses. I think O is smart and real enough to know it's drastic changes (or adjustments)


I think the answer to the intial question depends on the powers at LSU. For me it's 3 loses no more than 4. Anything thing beyond that is unacceptable. But in year 2 and 3, LsU has to make a serious run to win the West. If O shits the bed, see my first post.
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
28504 posts
Posted on 9/18/17 at 12:36 am to
quote:

worst case scenario is 3 loses


shite that's best case at this point. This team will not beat bama, auburn, florida and probably Tenn...add the bowl game and you're looking at a 7-6 or 8-5 season.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram