Started By
Message

When will colleges learn to stop giving those GIANT buyout packages

Posted on 9/7/17 at 6:35 pm
Posted by 6R12
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2005
8744 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 6:35 pm
to coaches that will eventually let them down? (minus Saban of course)
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66888 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 6:41 pm to
You can't go snag a coach with no security for them.

So never.
Posted by geauxpurple
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2014
12530 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 8:44 pm to
Each negotiation depends on who is holding the bargaining chips. Top notch coaches go to teams that can and will pay top dollar and buyout packages are part of the bidding process.
Posted by GeauxPack81
Member since Dec 2009
10484 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 8:45 pm to
Let me know when you convince a championship caliber coach to commit to coach your school without giving him job security. Would love to pass on the formula to Joe Alleva
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
83417 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 9:06 pm to
Giving Coach O a huge buyout is the biggest head scratcher


There was zero reason to include one. Like he wasnt gonna sign that contract without it?
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
28504 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 9:11 pm to
O getting a $12m buyout is the biggest frick up in the whole situation.
Posted by Spankum
Miss-sippi
Member since Jan 2007
56119 posts
Posted on 9/7/17 at 9:20 pm to
That is all a part of the game....if you want to keep a successful coach, you have to garantee him money....and then if your fans demand that you fire him the next year, you are gonna pay the debt.
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 7:59 am to
Aren't the "buyouts" the money the coach has to pay the SCHOOL in order to take another job?

For example, Saban has NO BUYOUT. Meaning, he can leave Alabama and not pay them a nickel.

A coach with a large "buyout" owes the college the money if he leaves. It is a poison pill to make it difficult for other schools to poach them. As coaches get more "power", the buyout goes DOWN because he can negotiate from strength.

I think the contract is the contract and the school owes that amount if it fires the coach for anything other than "for cause".

So, when Miles had 4 years left on his contract, he was nearly "unfireable" because he was owed so much money. That is why LSU stopped the 'automatic rollover' part of the contract as things got more bleak. It reduced the years left on the contract for which LSU would owe if he was fired.

Also, the contract can state the years of the payout. So, if a team owes a coach for 2 years of salary, it can sometimes be paid out over more years (example: 10 year payout)

Finally, often a school and a coach may negotiate a lower payoff than the contract owed amount in order to let the coach "resign" rather than be "fired", etc.


IF Orgeron has a "huge buyout"...it means he is bound to LSU and not able to leave it very easily.
Posted by LosTigres25
Frisco, TX
Member since Jan 2017
365 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 8:24 am to
When supply and demand is not a useful formula in business any longer.
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 7:16 pm to

If you think Miles let LSU down
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
14782 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 7:31 pm to
Is the firing but out the same as the taking another job out? Are there 2 different buyouts negotiated?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram