Started By
Message

re: Bannon out at WH

Posted on 8/18/17 at 6:14 pm to
Posted by CheniereTiger108
Member since Jul 2014
1610 posts
Posted on 8/18/17 at 6:14 pm to
A) if Bannon/Breitbart were so influential, Cruz would have won more than 7-8 states. He had FAR more money available than Trump did throughout the entire campaign.

B) Clinton was always way ahead in the "polls." So much so, that she didn't even bother with going to the Rust Belt states at all. It was a "given victory" for her all the way into the morning of Election Day, according to the media and their "polls." She even had a big fireworks victory party planned to celebrate. There was no mention of Comey being a problem for her- until AFTER she lost. Then that and muh Russia became the EXCUSE- when in reality, it was just that she was unlikeable, untrustworthy and downright shady. The signs of a Trump victory were there all along- majorly skewed polls and rally size comparisons, to name a couple.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram