re: Abraham Lincoln wasn't a republican according to Google

quote:

---

quote:
Care to expound

No

You're a troll.

Been there. Done that.


Not to your liking I suppose.

---

You're missing the point, so I'll try saying it differently.

Debating on this forum can be an enlightening process, particularly when both transactors are open minded and willing to learn. Even if bull-headed debators don't acknowledge good points, lurkers can learn something.

But conversing/debating with you on certain issues is akin to doing the same with Otto/Spidey or Rex. In a way, it's like fighting a retard. I don't mean that to sound like an insult to your intelligence, and I understand that with such a reference, it's tough to avoid that. What I mean by that is much like a retard doesn't really know when it's hurt or wounded, you Otto/Spidey, Rex, all those conspiracy kooks, and others like that don't recognize when your point has been rendered totally invalid. You just change focus as if you're more interested in some imaginary win. It's as if you are more committed to a narrative than evidence.

I'm sure you as well as those others believe it's actually the other side not being open minded, so answer this question:

What evidence would it take to convince you that Republican policies would do more to help African Americans than Democrat policies have?

What evidence would it take to convince you that real life consequences (that are highly predictable) are more telling about a party's position than their stated goals?