Started By
Message
locked post

Why aren't these conservative geniuses talking about repealing the 17th?

Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:07 am
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:07 am
Lots of gum flapping about changing the Consitution to enact term limits, nothing about repealing the 17th (which is more important IMO).

They don't understand the issue?
Know it won't happen?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:08 am to
quote:

They don't understand the issue?
Probably

quote:

Know it won't happen?

Truth
Posted by PowerTool
The dark side of the road
Member since Dec 2009
21216 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:09 am to
We're focused on the 19th.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119029 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Why aren't these conservative geniuses talking about repealing the 17th?



It's brought up on this board all the time.

Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99153 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:13 am to
I am absolutely for that.

The 17th Amendment is easily the most destructive amendment ever put in the Constitution. It was the death knell of federalism.
Posted by 9th life
birmingham
Member since Sep 2009
7310 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:17 am to
I don't think it is a bad idea, and can think of some long-term benefits to reverting to that process, but I don't think it will happen.



Posted by rebeloke
Member since Nov 2012
16144 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:19 am to
No worries, the world changed on July 27th.
Posted by 5thTiger
Member since Nov 2014
7996 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:21 am to
quote:

repealing the 17th (which is more important IMO)


Why in the world is this board so obsessed with not letting citizens vote for their own Senators directly? You all bitch about corruption 24/7, yet you advocate for one of the most corrupt systems of election.

Is it because you think it will help you gain more Senators? Because if we did repeal the 17th, you know who would be gone? The Tea Party, Rand Paul, and all your other favorites. It would be the ultimate establishment picks.

I seriously don't get it. You are advocating for something that goes completely against all the other things you like to advocate for.

*Usually, no one ever responds to me, but somehow, this thread blossoms up again day after day.
This post was edited on 8/2/17 at 9:30 am
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96437 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:51 am to
It won't happen if only because those self absorbed shitheads in the upper chamber won't ratify it because most, if not all, of them wouldn't get reappointed.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68216 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 10:10 am to
Mike Huckabee called for it last week.

The 17th is half baked.

If you directly elect senators you might as well go to a unicameral legislature.
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
21301 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 10:30 am to
Interdasting thought -



I agree with many here on the Senate is f'd up right now, but I think the left would fight this to their death anyway. Kind of dumb to say why will the right not push it, the left would go nuclear if they did.
Posted by DeafJam73
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
18518 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 4:53 pm to
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but people on this board would rather have the legislation select our Senators rather than vote for them directly? Why would anyone think that's a good idea?
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71383 posts
Posted on 8/2/17 at 7:57 pm to
It would be unpopular.

You really want John Alario and Francis Heitmeier in the US Senate? Because that's how you get John Alario and Francis Heitmeier in the US Senate.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram