Started By
Message

re: MLS rejected a $4 billion media rights deal bc it required pro/rel

Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:32 pm to
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84932 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:32 pm to
Ok so if we get to 2023 and their next deal is worth less than 4 billion you'll agree it was a bad move?
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96053 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

Ok so if we get to 2023 and their next deal is worth less than 4 billion you'll agree it was a bad move?



No. How can it be a bad move when they specifically laid out that contractually they cannot even consider it?
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

Ok so if we get to 2023 and their next deal is worth less than 4 billion you'll agree it was a bad move?

Not necessarily. Getting 3b while keeping more control of the league would probably be favorable to what was proposed in this deal.

And there's nothing stopping them from making this same proposal 5 years from now.
This post was edited on 7/24/17 at 1:57 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram