Started By
Message
locked post

the slyest, most hilarious, nauseating, self-serving nugget of OJ parole

Posted on 7/20/17 at 5:50 pm
Posted by crescentcity
Member since Feb 2015
1311 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 5:50 pm

"...I support the jury system"


Every member of the fraternity of people who have committed and gotten away with murder just winked at you, bro
Posted by AU_Right
Member since Oct 2016
3048 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 5:57 pm to
quote:


"...I support the jury system"

What was it...9 blacks, 2 Hispanics and 1 white?
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36238 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 6:36 pm to
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19109 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 6:39 pm to
Didnt he say he had never used a weapon in an altercation with anyone before going to that hotel room during the parole hearing?
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164342 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 7:58 pm to
OJ was retarded, self centered, and an a-hole today. Prison didn't change him at all. I thought they might keep him in jail since he was so defiant and unrepentant today. His attorney was a clown. It was like they didn't prep at all.
Posted by Spock's Eyebrow
Member since May 2012
12300 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

"...I support the jury system"


He has a history of odd comments about juries. I remember him telling Judge Ito that he was "mindful of the mood and the stamina of this jury" to explain why he wasn't going to take the stand.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35242 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

"...I support the jury system"
I actually find the jury system to be one of the most terrifying aspects of government that actually has a logical function.

Even when it's a 12 person jury, requiring unanimity, it should be comforting to an innocent person on trial. Yet, time and time again, cases with little evidence besides eyewitness testimony and/or other circumstantial evidence, result in a conviction (sometimes death penalty), only to later find exculpatory evidence proving their innocence.

And some states (I think Louisiana is one), an eyewitness can recant his/her story, and they can still present the original story as evidence. There are even cases where a single witness is really the only real evidence and that witness later recants the story, but the original story is admitted anyways, AND the person gets convicted. How DAs justify that reprehensible decision to move forward anyways, and how the jury makes those decisions, is terrifying.
This post was edited on 7/20/17 at 8:34 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram