- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dunkirk discussion (NO SPOILERS)
Posted on 7/24/17 at 6:40 pm to Carson123987
Posted on 7/24/17 at 6:40 pm to Carson123987
quote:
And jeff, the setting is certainly a character, but it can't be the ONLY character.
I never said it was the only character and neither did you. You said characters were underdeveloped. The setting and themes for this movie allow for under developed characters. To have them, would have destroyed one of The major themes of the film.
With the chaos of being on that beach with over 400,000 men, do you think most of the people you would meet would give you their life story or would you experience a brief run in with RANDOM people whom you survive with and then watch them disappear in the crowd when you get home?
Do you think the pilots would See the "henchmen" as anything else other than just planes attacking?
I don't think Dunkirk was his best work, but this was not one of the downsides. It was very similar to how my grandfather said things were during WWII.
This post was edited on 7/24/17 at 7:33 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News