re: Who will be LSU's 2nd leading receiver after Chark?

quote:

---

I hope it's not Guice. That means our WR's are going to have a bad year.

---

That's not necessarily true. The passing game at Pitt had a pretty good distribution of targets. Their leading receiver only had 36 catches. The next guy had 35. James Conner was the 5th leading pass catcher, but 3rd on the team in terms of receiving yards. I think Guice is a much better receiver than Conner and LSU has at least one other RB (Williams) who has proven he can pick up yardage in the SEC. I wouldn't be shocked to see the move Guice around in a ton of different places.

The more times you can get the ball in #5's hands, the better. Opposing defenses know that and will key on him, so why not try to move him around and get favorable matchups (even if that is sometimes in the passing game)