- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 7/7/17 at 1:08 pm to Sun Ra
quote:
Sure.
Now care to refute, "dumbass"?
no one is going to argue that there are less interracial babies/couples now compared to Jim Crow. No shite dude.
You seem hell bent on making this an interracial thing when it is clearly a class and education topic.
This post was edited on 7/7/17 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 7/7/17 at 1:29 pm to Sun Ra
quote:
Now care to refute, "dumbass"?
Your data shows that a larger percentage of "mixed race" infants are black/white as opposed to adults who are mixed race. It doesn't really suggest anything about the race of the father, mother, or marital data, for that matter.
On the contrary, white fathers were listed on the birth certificates of 3,025,000 babies in 2014, while white mothers were only listed on 3,020,000 birth certificates. Black fathers were listed for 656,000 babies, while black mothers were listed on 640,500 babies.
Surely there is overlap, but to infer it is increasing the number of unwed white pregnancies is not based in fact.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News