Started By
Message

re: Shawn Michaels vs. Bret Hart - Who did you prefer

Posted on 7/6/17 at 11:53 am to
Posted by Northshore Saint
Loranger, LA
Member since Feb 2013
1864 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 11:53 am to
Bret Hart. His matches were a work of art. He could carry just about anyone and put on a good show.

However, after watching a several interviews on YouTube discussing the "screw job", he really was the one that fricked himself over. He was set to go to WCW and WWE writers presented numerous stories where he was to drop the belt beforehand and he rejected them all, leaving them no choice but to do what they had to do. Still a huge fan of Bret but he took the while "Best there is, best there was, and best there ever will be " shtick a little too seriously.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84894 posts
Posted on 7/6/17 at 1:42 pm to
Montreal was a work

1. I have a really hard time believing that someone with the experience of a Bret Hart would not see that coming a mile away

2. and then on top of it let Shawn put him in his own submission finish where they could easily ring the bell on him.

3. Camera one zoomed right in on Bret after the finish rather than the new champ. Odd.

4. Bret had reasonable creative control in his contract for the last 30 days. Why did he never sue?

5. Why didn't Vince ever sue Bret for the punch?

6. I saw Sean Waltman make the point that in the Bret documentary Vince sold the punch like hell and that Vince is the kind of guy that would never ever let you see any kind of injury or weakness and that he thought Vince was mugging for the camera.
This post was edited on 7/6/17 at 1:45 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram