quote:
The point stands... you believe half of the report, and don't believe the other half... And in specific detail, the part where the hackers/hacker used old RNC domain names, therefore they were not able to collect important RNC data... is that true or not?

I don't believe that the Russian did not have the current domain name of the RNC.

According to the report, they had the old one but not the current one. Does that sound even possible to you? How hard is getting the domain name for a Russian hacker?

Eta: As I posted before, Wikileaks released some old, useless RNC stuff. Probably from the old domain name.

This post was edited on 6/22/17 at 1:50 am

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by TheArrogantCorndog

Highland Rd

Member since Sep 2009

14840 posts

Posted on 6/22/17 at 1:47 am to Bullethead88

quote:
According to the report, they had the old one but not the current one. Does that sound even possible to you? How hard is getting the domain name for a Russian hacker?

Yes, it does

So my previous point of you believing only the part of the report that suits your narrative, and discrediting the parts that don't fit your narrative, have been proven right

Thanks for playing, and goodnight

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by NC_Tigah

Carolinas

Member since Sep 2003

124240 posts

Posted on 6/22/17 at 4:12 am to Bullethead88

quote:
How hard is getting the domain name for a Russian hacker?

Far harder than not giving away your gmail password.

The question you want to ask, but don't know it, is why did the RNC switch domains in the first place? Why switch domains?

Realizing the answer could actually have to do with cybersecurity may prove to be your 'Eureka!' moment.

As debriefs have demonstrated, the RNC took FBI warnings re: cyberthreats far more seriously than did PoodleHair&Co.

0 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board