- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: USA Today: We need a Robert Mueller resignation
Posted on 6/20/17 at 1:37 am to 225bred
Posted on 6/20/17 at 1:37 am to 225bred
quote:
I agree with them. I've been saying that POTUS should fire Mueller due to his connections to Comey & his Clinton-donor appointees to his Special Counsel team.
So are you saying that Mueller should of vetted his appointees and made sure they didn't donate to Democrats?
How exactly does that work? Ask in the interview, "who did you donate to politically?" and tell them they can't get the job if they said anyone on the left?"
Does he then fire the people he appoints that he finds out donated to Democrats?
Why wouldn't people that donated to Republicans be a conflict as well?
Furthermore, should exercising your constitutional rights now disqualify you from public service?
This entire line of attack makes no sense. And that is before acknowledging that all the stuff I said is forbidden by a special counsel from asking in the hiring process. To establish this attack as being of consequence, we need some evidence that Mueller intentionally hired Democrat sympathizers with intent. There doesn't seem to be any evidence of that.
All from a guy that was appointed as a US Attorney by Reagan, Assistant Attorney General by George HW Bush, Deputy Attorney General by George W Bush, and then appointed FBI director by George W Bush by a vote of 98-0. Extended under Obama for several years as FBI director by 100-0 vote.
This post was edited on 6/20/17 at 1:44 am
6
Posted on 6/20/17 at 1:44 am to bonhoeffer45
Oh, bonehuffer, that's really not the point of all of this and you know it.
Posted on 6/20/17 at 4:56 am to bonhoeffer45
quote:
. There doesn't seem to be any evidence of that
You don't know what there is evidence of. You're just like McGrath. You post opinion as fact and hope nobody calls you out on it.
Posted on 6/20/17 at 5:11 am to bonhoeffer45
quote:
To establish this attack as being of consequence, we need some evidence that Mueller intentionally hired Democrat sympathizers with intent. There doesn't seem to be any evidence of that.
No evidence???''
Well hell = we need to appoint a special counsel to investigate that then - if there is no evidence we need to redouble our efforts to find some.
Isn't that how this thing works??
no evidence of collusion with Russkies - so lets appoint a Special Counsel to find some!!!!
Posted on 6/20/17 at 6:21 am to bonhoeffer45
quote:
Furthermore, should exercising your constitutional rights now disqualify you from public service?
It does actually, you can't say whatever you want in public service...think
Posted on 6/20/17 at 10:31 am to bonhoeffer45
quote:
To establish this attack as being of consequence, we need some evidence that Mueller intentionally hired Democrat sympathizers with intent. There doesn't seem to be any evidence of that.
Try hiring only white people to work in your business, or try renting your apartments only to white people. Then try telling a judge that there's no evidence you did it on purpose. Good luck with that.
This post was edited on 6/20/17 at 10:32 am
Posted on 6/20/17 at 10:34 am to bonhoeffer45
Your post makes no sense. The entire point of a SC is to investigate outside of the partisan realm.
Yes, Mueller should have vetted his staff to ensure bipartisanship. No one expects appointees to be apolitical, but we do expect a measure of balance or else, leave the investigation to the hacks at the fbi.
You would be here weeping blood if he stacked his team with Trump donors. Try a little honesty.
Yes, Mueller should have vetted his staff to ensure bipartisanship. No one expects appointees to be apolitical, but we do expect a measure of balance or else, leave the investigation to the hacks at the fbi.
You would be here weeping blood if he stacked his team with Trump donors. Try a little honesty.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News