- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Outdoor Clothing Giant Patagonia Pledging to Lead Resistance to Trump
Posted on 6/19/17 at 7:21 am to Will Cover
Posted on 6/19/17 at 7:21 am to Will Cover
10 responses and not 1 addressing the actual issue the CEO is against, which is selling off federal park land to private parties.
9
Posted on 6/19/17 at 7:22 am to cameronml
What federal land?
Posted on 6/19/17 at 7:24 am to cameronml
quote:
10 responses and not 1 addressing the actual issue the CEO is against, which is selling off federal park land to private parties.
Nope
Posted on 6/19/17 at 7:34 am to cameronml
quote:
10 responses and not 1 addressing the actual issue the CEO is against, which is selling off federal park land to private parties.
except for the one right above your post
"Resistance" over one God damned issue is looking for an excuse.
Posted on 6/19/17 at 7:34 am to cameronml
quote:
10 responses and not 1 addressing the actual issue the CEO is against, which is selling off federal park land to private parties.
A few short months ago that federal park land was owned by private parties. Then Obama deemed it federal park land and took it from those private parties.
Did you not know this, or do you just not care. What if Obama had deemed your house on federal park lands and made you move out. How would you feel then?
Posted on 6/19/17 at 7:43 am to cameronml
quote:
10 responses and not 1 addressing the actual issue the CEO is against, which is selling off federal park land to private parties.
bullshite. Which ones are you referring to?
Posted on 6/19/17 at 7:50 am to cameronml
quote:
10 responses and not 1 addressing the actual issue the CEO is against, which is selling off federal park land to private parties.
Holding, and in particular confiscating, land for "public use" and then heavily restricting the public's use of that land because of bizarre, nonsensical environmental regulations is the height of Marxist absurdism.
If anything, the government should be divesting the land - or, at worst, leasing it to private entities to operate as fully accessible recreation areas - not held in reserve out of some misguided notion that human beings are unnatural and that wild flora and fauna are somehow "superior" to human beings, particularly Americans.
If the land would better serve the public good by being developed for economic activity, then those options should be considered as well.
Posted on 6/19/17 at 7:57 am to cameronml
quote:
10 responses and not 1 addressing the actual issue the CEO is against, which is selling off federal park land to private parties
No, the actual issue is the federal government's ability to take land from states via the Monuments Act
This post was edited on 6/19/17 at 9:18 am
Posted on 6/19/17 at 10:03 am to cameronml
quote:
Outdoor Clothing Giant Patagonia Pledging to Lead Resistance to Trump
10 responses and not 1 addressing the actual issue the CEO is against, which is selling off federal park land to private parties.
You didn't address the actual issue either. Big fail on you.
Posted on 6/19/17 at 3:39 pm to cameronml
quote:
which is selling off federal park land to private parties
Which I imagine was once privately owned until the feds made a grab for it? In order to preserve it?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News