- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is Liverpool still a "big" club?
Posted on 6/14/17 at 2:44 pm to WarSlamEagle
Posted on 6/14/17 at 2:44 pm to WarSlamEagle
quote:
I think it has some validity if you're talking about teams who can seriously compete in the UCL.
You could argue that Real, Barca, Bayern, Juve and Atletico are the only true "big clubs" in Europe right now. The best of the Premier League is a step down at the moment.
I just read your reply. That's exactly what I meant. I think the divide is deeper than people realize, and the divide started before the massive influx of money into the PL with the new Sky deal.
Posted on 6/14/17 at 3:05 pm to crazy4lsu
I wonder if the greater parity in the Premier League title race makes it tougher for these clubs to compete for UCL titles.
Germany and Italy are great examples. Bayern and Juve don't have many major threats domestically at the moment, and they've been able to buy up the best talent from their league — even their biggest competitiors (BVB for Bayern, teams like Roma for Juve). Since they are so much better than most of their league, they can stay fresher for UCL matches and undercut their rivals with more money and prestige right now.
Since it's harder to dominate England and even harder now with the TV money for everybody, is it harder now to build up a team good enough to win in Europe?
I'm just thinking out loud here. The talent level is still lesser than those "big clubs." If you dropped this current Man City team in France, that wouldn't mean they'd automatically be UCL contenders this season.
But I will say that if Chelsea and City and United get rolling like they could under their respective managers, they should have the potential to compete for the UCL again in a few seasons. It's just going to take better squad-building and development in their current systems.
Germany and Italy are great examples. Bayern and Juve don't have many major threats domestically at the moment, and they've been able to buy up the best talent from their league — even their biggest competitiors (BVB for Bayern, teams like Roma for Juve). Since they are so much better than most of their league, they can stay fresher for UCL matches and undercut their rivals with more money and prestige right now.
Since it's harder to dominate England and even harder now with the TV money for everybody, is it harder now to build up a team good enough to win in Europe?
I'm just thinking out loud here. The talent level is still lesser than those "big clubs." If you dropped this current Man City team in France, that wouldn't mean they'd automatically be UCL contenders this season.
But I will say that if Chelsea and City and United get rolling like they could under their respective managers, they should have the potential to compete for the UCL again in a few seasons. It's just going to take better squad-building and development in their current systems.
This post was edited on 6/14/17 at 3:07 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News