Started By
Message

re: Why do pistol manufacturers label strikee fired actions as DAO?

Posted on 6/4/17 at 1:12 pm to
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 1:12 pm to
No need to hang around all day being wrong
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20457 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 2:46 pm to
Just from a functional aspect, I think of them as SAO. I know there are different internal mechanics, but to me:

a SAO pistol with no safety engaged, is "cocked" (ready to fire) when you rack the slide, and pulling trigger will fire the chambered round. I mean, something will hit the primer and it will attempt to set the charge off to launch the bullet down the barrel.
If for whatever reason that chambered round does not fire (light strike, dummy round, etc), simply pulling the trigger again does not cause something to strike the primer again, in a SAO. You must recock the mechanism; with a striker fired gun you can't get to the striker, so you rack the slide. With a 1911 or Hi Power (SAO hammer fired guns), you can access the hammer, and can recock it... or you can rack the slide.

With a DA/SA gun, you can just pull the trigger again.

So in JUST MY OPINION, I consider anything that can have a second strike by just pulling the trigger, to be DA, and anything that requires additional action beyond pulling the trigger to be SA.

Going beyond that gets confusing and pointless to me, as far as function.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram