Started By
Message

re: Robert E. Lee has been misrepresented by regressive "historians"

Posted on 5/22/17 at 1:35 pm to
Posted by windshieldman
Member since Nov 2012
12818 posts
Posted on 5/22/17 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

I have a Master's in this subject. I believe I have done quite a bit of reading on the causes of the Civil War over the years. The arguments you speak of weren't floated about until 10-20 years after the fact.

The South seceded over slavery. There can be no debate or argument over this fact


I have a degree in history myself. As far as the South seceded over slavery and slavery only. I don't care either way, I just know that it's untrue.
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 5/22/17 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

I have a degree in history myself. As far as the South seceded over slavery and slavery only. I don't care either way, I just know that it's untrue.


The southerners definitely were ready to toss our nation of beloved memories so they could continue to get their bread from the sweat of other men's faces.

That is the real deal.

One of the bullshite things you hear from the ignorant is how could the war be about slavery when most southern soldiers didn’t own slaves?

The antebellum south was rigidly caste like. And the poor whites were at the very bottom of the heap – only having the black slaves below -them-. They were willing to join the army and fight so as to keep the social order as it was. But as a newly minted black soldier told some captured confederates: “Bottom rail on top now.”
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram