Started By
Message

re: Would We Have Been Better Off If The Gov't Let The Banks Bottom Out, Not Bailing Em Out?

Posted on 5/15/17 at 9:07 pm to
Posted by AjaxFury
In & out of The Matrix
Member since Sep 2014
9928 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 9:07 pm to
Problem is, a lot of smaller banks didn't survive & the free market took a hit.

Big banks took our tax $, acquired their competition, & resumed gouging consumers even more after. As close to socialism as I've seen in action on that scale here.
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
68364 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 9:15 pm to
quote:

Problem is, a lot of smaller banks didn't survive & the free market took a hit.

Big banks took our tax $, acquired their competition, & resumed gouging consumers even more after. As close to socialism as I've seen in action on that scale here


Oh, I agree completely. I just said what the rational was.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 9:21 pm to
quote:

Big banks took our tax $, a
The banks were loaned money which they repaid at market interest rates which actually reduced the federal deficit.

A couple of the banks also issued stock warrants to the fed government (Citibank comes to mind) which the government eventually sold at a pretty good profit for taxpayers.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 5/16/17 at 12:01 am to
could have let AIG die. not even an USA company.

could have let all the banking companies with HQ in Caymans and Switzerland die too.

I would say that saving the US auto industry was a win.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram