Started By
Message

re: Would We Have Been Better Off If The Gov't Let The Banks Bottom Out, Not Bailing Em Out?

Posted on 5/15/17 at 9:05 pm to
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
68364 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 9:05 pm to
I think the rational was to prevent another great depression.
Posted by AjaxFury
In & out of The Matrix
Member since Sep 2014
9928 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 9:07 pm to
Problem is, a lot of smaller banks didn't survive & the free market took a hit.

Big banks took our tax $, acquired their competition, & resumed gouging consumers even more after. As close to socialism as I've seen in action on that scale here.
Posted by Alltheway Tigers!
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
7160 posts
Posted on 5/16/17 at 9:39 am to
quote:

I think the rational was to prevent another great depression.


Yep. The powers that be felt the world was on the edge looking down.

Depressions suck. I listen to my grand parents and their friends talk about their lives during the Great one. Not a happy place. WW2 was the kicker that got us out of the Great one. The destruction of so many world's economies/productivity capacity lead to the rise of the USA in the 50s and beyond.

I don't think today's USA population is ready for something like that. I mean, with technology and instant news, the panic effect would be a tidal wave. I can easily see the next big Depression having some serious short-term effects. Big riots in major metro areas. Shortages. etc. These events would fuel further insurrections and a possible snowball effect.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram