Started By
Message

re: Charles Bronson vs Clint Eastwood

Posted on 5/15/17 at 12:16 pm to
Posted by winntiger
318
Member since Jul 2004
1261 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Do you even 'Hard Times', bro?


Exactly and he was in his 50's for Hard Times. The SOB worked in coal mines, earned a Purple Heart in WW2, and turned down Sergio Leone for the "Man with No Name" trilogy and who was the second choice....Clint Eastwood.

Eastwood is by far one of my favorite actors and directors way more so than Bronson. But in a bare knuckle brawl in a dark alley I'm taking Bronson with me everytime.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

But in a bare knuckle brawl in a dark alley I'm taking Bronson with me everytime.



In their primes, Clint Eastwood was seven inches taller and 60 pounds heavier than Bronson.

Not to mention the fact Eastwood was younger. My money would have been on Eastwood.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram