- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The pay-for-play debate
Posted on 5/8/17 at 3:08 pm to Tiger Phil
Posted on 5/8/17 at 3:08 pm to Tiger Phil
quote:
And these players playing at their tournaments that FC Dallas (or Atlanta United or Houston Dynamo, etc.) play on teams not affiliated with MLS clubs. And they are paying fees to play for those clubs.
Correct, now if these teams can get paid for the players they develop then we can move away from that. But USSF will not allow it.
quote:
No one pays to play youth soccer in Spain because enough people pay money to watch professional soccer in Spain. There is enough revenue to make it so. There is not enough revenue associated with professional soccer in order to pay youth soccer coaches!
Travel teams that are not MLS affiliated could pay coaches and for stuff if they got their fair pay or if USSF actually invested in them. Instead USSF takes money from the.
1
Posted on 5/8/17 at 3:15 pm to StraightCashHomey21
Are you suggesting that there is enough money to pay youth soccer coaches in the USA. The revenue is there, but it is just all going into the USSF's pockets instead of into the local club and youth soccer coaches' pockets?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News