Started By
Message

re: The pay-for-play debate

Posted on 5/8/17 at 2:42 pm to
Posted by Tiger Phil
I see burnt orange everywhere
Member since Nov 2007
1587 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

Making 100 million every couple of year, is easly a start to sustain a real infrastructure to develop players.


That Copa America was not a recurring event. That's not a revenue stream. That's a gift.

And I assure you that not all players who play for FC Dallas do so for free. The vast majority pay to play. So clearly FC Dallas does not make enough to even fund it's own youth operation, much less to pay transfer fees to fund other clubs.

Yeah, I'm the one who doesn't know what he is talking about.

Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125525 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

That Copa America was not a recurring event. That's not a revenue stream. That's a gift.


But the world cup is

quote:

And I assure you that not all players who play for FC Dallas do so for free. The vast majority pay to play. So clearly FC Dallas does not make enough to even fund it's own youth operation, much less to pay transfer fees to fund other clubs. Yeah, I'm the one who doesn't know what he is talking about


The entire FC Dallas system is huge, they have so many teams its absurd. But the actual top level academy players playing on the A team are not paying to play.

I'm not talking about kids who have to pay just to be under the FC Dallas umbrella. Their set up isn't a traditional academy set up. When a club has one u-9,u-10, u-12, u-14, u-16, u-18 and u-21/23.
This post was edited on 5/8/17 at 2:54 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram