- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: In case missed it, Comey admits that Huma broke the law, but couldn't prove intent...
Posted on 5/3/17 at 11:45 pm to MizzouBS
Posted on 5/3/17 at 11:45 pm to MizzouBS
This isn't a tort case, but a criminal matter. The crime they're accused of lacks an intent requirement. Just doing it, even accidentally is a felony. Intent can result in a more severe sentence, but it does not impact the prosecution.
1
Posted on 5/4/17 at 9:14 am to kingbob
quote:
The crime they're accused of lacks an intent requirement. Just doing it, even accidentally is a felony.
If that's true then all they need to prove is Fraudulent Intent which is that she committed the crime.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News