- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sterling decision released by DOJ...no charges for officers
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:34 am to tke857
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:34 am to tke857
quote:
If the federal government decides not to bring charges against the officers, Louisiana has the option of bringing charges of its own.
Would this even happen? I mean why would the state AG pursue charges if the US AG did not?
2
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:46 am to SUB
Looks like Baton Rouge police still not going to play
.@BRPD arrested 3 women around midnight after small group of protesters briefly blocked Airline Highway by @BRPD HQ
Police arrested the women for failure to disperse, resisting & aggr. obstruction of a highway (a felony). Two also face additional count.
.@BRPD arrested 3 women around midnight after small group of protesters briefly blocked Airline Highway by @BRPD HQ
Police arrested the women for failure to disperse, resisting & aggr. obstruction of a highway (a felony). Two also face additional count.
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:57 am to SUB
quote:
I mean why would the state AG pursue charges if the US AG did not?
The DOJ was investigating whether or not there was a civil rights violation. The state would investigate it as a murder, manslaughter, etc. But yes, if there wasn't enough evidence for the DOJ to bring charges, it seems unlikely that the state would pursue it.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News