- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I think secondary needing to be addressed more important than one pass rusher
Posted on 4/29/17 at 11:21 am to chRxis
Posted on 4/29/17 at 11:21 am to chRxis
quote:
and he's still MILES ahead of anything we have as far as a pass rush goes...
his career high before last year was 2.5 sacks
you really want to make this argument? i'll let you take it back before you embarrass yourself further
quote:
look, we obviously think that the way to improve the D is different... but i guess after this year, we'll know who is right... let's bookmark it and see who is....
how are you even going to do that? there was no starting DE with elite pass rushing talent this year outside of 1 guy. he went #1 overall
Posted on 4/29/17 at 11:31 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
his career high before last year was 2.5 sacks
so, that negates the fact that he had 12.5 last year, a year where the D played on was top 5 vs. the pass? he had a very active role in helping that team achieve that.... we don't have anyone like that on our squad... and we didn't try to get one this year either apparently...
quote:
how are you even going to do that? there was no starting DE with elite pass rushing talent this year outside of 1 guy. he went #1 overall
are you kidding? this was a very deep draft for pass rushers, and we skipped over all of them, multiple times...
like i said, let's revisit this thread at the end of the season, and see what ended up being more important... we evidently are great in the secondary now, with the picks we made, so if we finish in the top 16 vs. the pass, considering we don't have shite as far as a pass rush, then you were right... our coverage was the problem, not the pass rush... but if we still end up in the bottom half, even with this now great secondary, then evidently you were wrong, and our pass rush is at fault....
let's bookmark it and see who ends up being right... you or me...
This post was edited on 4/29/17 at 11:34 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News