Started By
Message

re: Trump tells SK they need to pay for missle defense

Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:14 pm to
Posted by lilaznfish123
Arlington, VA
Member since Sep 2013
618 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:14 pm to
THAAD is there mainly protect the US troops and people in the US mainland. It would be in America's best interests to have THAAD. THAAD does not protect South Korea...North Korea could destroy Seoul in minutes and THAAD can't protect against those type of missiles. SK does pay the US troops to be in SK, so It's not like they're getting everything for free.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140778 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

THAAD does not protect South Korea.


Not trying to be a smart arse but to learn more.

So are you saying that if missiles are fired over the heads of US soldiers and just at Seoul then THAAD won't be employed?

Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58943 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

THAAD is there mainly protect the US troops and people in the US mainland.


Yes and no. It is to protect US Troops in SK, but the NK does not have a missile capable of carrying a nuclear warhead that can reach the mainland.
quote:

THAAD does not protect South Korea.

If it is protecting our troops in SK, how in the world can it not be protecting SK?

quote:

North Korea could destroy Seoul in minutes and THAAD can't protect against those type of missiles.

If true, then THAAD is not protecting our troops, either. You can't have it both ways.

quote:

SK does pay the US troops to be in SK, so It's not like they're getting everything for free.

This is true. they have been paying a portion since 1991. (I don't know what our portion is)

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram