Started By
Message

re: Does Canada's offense require a dual threat QB, pro style, hybrid?

Posted on 4/26/17 at 10:48 am to
Posted by Canwoodtiger
Member since Oct 2015
3737 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 10:48 am to
quote:

I hear ya. I'm sure he has a preference, but I think it's part of his job to mask deficiencies of whatever QB we go with. He'd probably like the dude to be 6'5" 225 with an accurate cannon and can scramble like Mike Vick.. but we don't have any of those guys. I see what you're saying though. They mentioned it briefly in the spring game about using a two QB system, but we all know how that's worked in the past. I would be okay with certain packages for a DT QB, for example. I just want it to be clear that there's THE guy, and just packages for the other(s). I don't want a full multi-QB system. I think that messes with their head.


In the past, a two QB system gave us 11-2 in 2010 with a Cotton Bowl win vs. aTm. 2011 we technically played two QBs (although vast majority not all at one time) and went undefeated in regular season.So, based on not so distant history - yeah two QBs can work:).
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
9048 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 11:54 am to
1)In 2010 JJ was the QB for the entire year.

2)2011 wasn't a dual QB system. We had JL start and play almost all the snaps until Alabama made him quit and then JJ started the rest of the season while JL watched from the bench.

You receive no points and may God have mercy on your soul.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram