Started By
Message

re: Rand Paul introduces MILITARY HUMANITARIAN OPERATIONS ACT OF 2017

Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:12 pm to
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71446 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

if NK launches on SK he wants to have congress approve



quote:

(b) Operations Not Included.--The term ``military humanitarian 
operation'' does not mean a military operation undertaken for the 
following purposes: 
(1) Responding to or repelling attacks, or preventing 
imminent attacks, on the United States or any of its 
territorial possessions, embassies, or consulates, or members 
of the United States Armed Forces. 

(2) Direct acts of reprisal for attacks on the United 
States or any of its territorial possessions, embassies, or 
consulates, or members of the United States Armed Forces. 

(5) Carrying out treaty commitments to directly aid allies 
in distress. 


NK attacking SK would fall under 1, 2, and 5.
Posted by Texas Weazel
Louisiana is a shithole
Member since Oct 2016
8549 posts
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

NK attacking SK would fall under 1, 2, and 5.


Not that it would make a difference, but just 5. North Korea could technically? attack South Korea in parts of the country in which we have no military or government presence. But that would still cause the Mutual Defense Treaty to kick in, so...same result.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram