- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rand Paul introduces MILITARY HUMANITARIAN OPERATIONS ACT OF 2017
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:12 pm to thelawnwranglers
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:12 pm to thelawnwranglers
quote:
if NK launches on SK he wants to have congress approve
quote:
(b) Operations Not Included.--The term ``military humanitarian
operation'' does not mean a military operation undertaken for the
following purposes:
(1) Responding to or repelling attacks, or preventing
imminent attacks, on the United States or any of its
territorial possessions, embassies, or consulates, or members
of the United States Armed Forces.
(2) Direct acts of reprisal for attacks on the United
States or any of its territorial possessions, embassies, or
consulates, or members of the United States Armed Forces.
(5) Carrying out treaty commitments to directly aid allies
in distress.
NK attacking SK would fall under 1, 2, and 5.
Posted on 4/20/17 at 10:29 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
NK attacking SK would fall under 1, 2, and 5.
Not that it would make a difference, but just 5. North Korea could technically? attack South Korea in parts of the country in which we have no military or government presence. But that would still cause the Mutual Defense Treaty to kick in, so...same result.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News