- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Schumer vs McConnell
Posted on 4/1/17 at 1:03 am to Rakim
Posted on 4/1/17 at 1:03 am to Rakim
That deal wouldn't work. McConnell can't just say Garland will get Breyer or Ginsburg's seat. Trump would have to nominate Garland.
Will say, Senate Dems fricked the Senate forever by requiring it to be a simple majority for cabinet confirmations instead of requiring 60. That hurt them for the DeVos vote.
Will say, Senate Dems fricked the Senate forever by requiring it to be a simple majority for cabinet confirmations instead of requiring 60. That hurt them for the DeVos vote.
1
Posted on 4/1/17 at 1:46 am to Parmen
quote:
That deal wouldn't work. McConnell can't just say Garland will get Breyer or Ginsburg's seat. Trump would have to nominate Garland.
Will say, Senate Dems fricked the Senate forever by requiring it to be a simple majority for cabinet confirmations instead of requiring 60. That hurt them for the DeVos vote.
Of course Trump would nominate Garland in this scenario. I believe the Senate is looking over the abyss and is starting to reconsider the path its on. Harry Reid is a huge reason the Senate is where it is.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News