- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
AI: The future of humanity and artificial intelligence
Posted on 3/27/17 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 3/27/17 at 2:22 pm
Vanity Fair Article by Dowd on Elon Musk and AI
What are your thoughts on this subject? I've been reading on it lately and to be honest, it is scary stuff.
By the way, the linked article is long but worth the read.
What are your thoughts on this subject? I've been reading on it lately and to be honest, it is scary stuff.
By the way, the linked article is long but worth the read.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 2:28 pm to DeltaDoc
Listen to Joe Rogan's podcast #930 with Will MacAskill
Posted on 3/27/17 at 2:30 pm to DeltaDoc
I'm hopeful there is an intelligence barrier that even computers can't cross. I don't like the thought of being dethroned at the top of the food chain.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 2:32 pm to DeltaDoc
If you like novels...you'd find "The Transhumanist Wager" fun. Smart dude wrote it. The essential point is that there are people out there who indeed believe that the ticket to immortality and 'Heaven' is through high tech. And they will NOT be constrained by Religious Ideas or Theological-based morality which they consider ludicrous...and in effect, immoral...if it denies them their basic freedom to pursue immortality via high tech.
I found if overly dramatic and simplistic in the way it portrayed the (stereotypically stupid, selfish and evil) Religious characters. But you'll get the drift.
Brave new world coming. "I will take the wise in their own craftiness" (Good Book). I guess somebody has to do it.
I found if overly dramatic and simplistic in the way it portrayed the (stereotypically stupid, selfish and evil) Religious characters. But you'll get the drift.
Brave new world coming. "I will take the wise in their own craftiness" (Good Book). I guess somebody has to do it.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 2:32 pm to DeltaDoc
Start with artificial Womb first. That will be a game changer.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 2:34 pm to DeltaDoc
Posted on 3/27/17 at 2:35 pm to DeltaDoc
Terminator will come to fruition.
Probably not in our lifetime
Probably not in our lifetime
Posted on 3/27/17 at 2:38 pm to DeltaDoc
The second beast was given power to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that the image could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed.
That, my friends, is Artificial Intelligence.
That, my friends, is Artificial Intelligence.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 2:46 pm to DeltaDoc
Blah blah Skynet blah blah robot overlords.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 2:57 pm to DeltaDoc
It's pretty much inevitable. I don't think it will happen in my lifetime, but its coming.
What I do see in my lifetime is the beginning of the moral debate on AI "slavery" and whatnot
What I do see in my lifetime is the beginning of the moral debate on AI "slavery" and whatnot
Posted on 3/27/17 at 3:03 pm to DeltaDoc
Read the article this morning and was weighing whether to kill myself.
But then I realized that if I just waited for the Terminators to do it for me, I would in essence be exercising final control over their actions!
So at least I'll have that going for me...
But then I realized that if I just waited for the Terminators to do it for me, I would in essence be exercising final control over their actions!
So at least I'll have that going for me...
Posted on 3/27/17 at 3:12 pm to DeltaDoc
Like robots won't follow us to Mars, they're ALREADY THERE!!!
Posted on 3/27/17 at 3:19 pm to DeltaDoc
Robot start fricking with me I'm firing up the cutting torch. Terminator be gone.
Posted on 3/27/17 at 3:33 pm to DeltaDoc
AI will, won't or already has come into (limited) fruition, depending on your criteria.
It wasn't that long ago that some smart people believed that AI would be "here" once computers could beat humans at chess because chess supposedly required a level of human like strategic thinking. Nope, you just needed enough capacity to know all 600 sextillion or however many moves and you were golden.
It wasn't that long ago that some smart people believed that AI would be "here" once computers could beat humans at chess because chess supposedly required a level of human like strategic thinking. Nope, you just needed enough capacity to know all 600 sextillion or however many moves and you were golden.
This post was edited on 3/27/17 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 3/27/17 at 4:17 pm to DeltaDoc
Also this is a good summary of the various skeptical criticisms of Musk/Hawking/Bostrom/etc.
quote:
The Argument From Stephen Hawking's Cat
Stephen Hawking is one of the most brilliant people alive, but say he wants to get his cat into the cat carrier. How's he going to do it?
He can model the cat's behavior in his mind and figure out ways to persuade it. He knows a lot about feline behavior. But ultimately, if the cat doesn't want to get in the carrier, there's nothing Hawking can do about it despite his overpowering advantage in intelligence.
Even if he devoted his career to feline motivation and behavior, rather than theoretical physics, he still couldn't talk the cat into it.
You might think I'm being offensive or cheating because Stephen Hawking is disabled. But an artificial intelligence would also initially not be embodied, it would be sitting on a server somewhere, lacking agency in the world. It would have to talk to people to get what it wants.
quote:
The Argument From My Roommate
My roommate was the smartest person I ever met in my life. He was incredibly brilliant, and all he did was lie around and play World of Warcraft between bong rips.
The assumption that any intelligent agent will want to recursively self-improve, let alone conquer the galaxy, to better achieve its goals makes unwarranted assumptions about the nature of motivation.
It's perfectly possible an AI won't do much of anything, except use its powers of hyperpersuasion to get us to bring it brownies.
quote:
The Argument From Childhood
Intelligent creatures don't arise fully formed. We're born into this world as little helpless messes, and it takes us a long time of interacting with the world and with other people in the world before we can start to be intelligent beings.
Even the smartest human being comes into the world helpless and crying, and requires years to get some kind of grip on themselves.
It's possible that the process could go faster for an AI, but it is not clear how much faster it could go. Exposure to real-world stimuli means observing things at time scales of seconds or longer.
Moreover, the first AI will only have humans to interact with—its development will necessarily take place on human timescales. It will have a period when it needs to interact with the world, with people in the world, and other baby superintelligences to learn to be what it is.
Furthermore, we have evidence from animals that the developmental period *grows* with increasing intelligence, so that we would have to babysit an AI and change its (figurative) diapers for decades before it grew coordinated enough to enslave us all.
This post was edited on 3/27/17 at 4:18 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News