re: Baseball cards: A couple of sweet pulls

Posted on 4/1/17 at 10:20 pm to CRDNLSCHMCPSN11

Posted by ShamelessPel

Metairie

Member since Apr 2013

12724 posts

Posted on 4/1/17 at 10:20 pm to CRDNLSCHMCPSN11

Certain teams cost more. That's the problem. The pels were expensive AF. The Lakers and Cowboys are used as fillers to get people to buy random teams. I just got lucky and got Lakers.

It'd be really tough for someone running their first one to price these teams. Pels cost almost double the Bulls which had wade, butler, Pippen etc as options.

My point is it'd have to be random.

Also Kobe and VC up

This post was edited on 4/1/17 at 10:21 pm

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by CRDNLSCHMCPSN11

Member since Dec 2014

17386 posts

Posted on 4/1/17 at 10:35 pm to ShamelessPel

I don't follow NBA that closely, but yeah. Not all teams are created equally in these breaks. For MLB, it's harder to fill teams like Padres, Mariners, Marlins, Diamondbacks because they don't have the die hard collecting base as some other teams do. Plus, teams like Red Sox, Yankees, Scrubs have more HOF'ers, stars, rookies, or prospects in the product. So that's why some teams have to be cheaper.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by McCaigBro69

TigerDroppings Premium Member

Member since Oct 2014

45094 posts

Posted on 4/1/17 at 11:04 pm to ShamelessPel

quote:
Certain teams cost more. That's the problem. The pels were expensive AF. The Lakers and Cowboys are used as fillers to get people to buy random teams. I just got lucky and got Lakers.

It's crazy, in every PYT break I've been in I don't get shite.

Like the one the other night where I got that Chris Sale auto was one where I had Chi White Sox, Pittsburgh Pirates and like the Phillies