quote:
yes because surveillance was invented yesterday and it's never been abused before. There's no possible way we might have some historical record of what happens when governments have massive surveillance programs

Well you have it crabbed, pal. The burden of proof is on you. You guys are spinning about the same possible, legal, incidental, "non-wiretap," collection we were talking about two months ago.

And you're legitimately shitting your pants. How does one spin himself up like that over nothing?

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by ShortyRob

Member since Oct 2008

82116 posts

Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:50 pm to Navytiger74

quote:
you have it crabbed, pal. The burden of proof is on you. You guys are spinning about the same possible, legal, incidental, "non-wiretap," collection we were talking about two months ago.

And you're legitimately shitting your pants. How does one spin himself up like that over nothing?

damn that was weak sauce Navy. Whole lot of words to say nothing

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Dwag4life

Member since Mar 2017

92 posts

Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:13 pm to Navytiger74

If you believe what the WH and associates are spinning then you are a moron

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by texashorn

Member since May 2008

13122 posts

Posted on 3/22/17 at 8:10 pm to Navytiger74

quote:
The burden of proof is on you. You guys are spinning about the same possible, legal, incidental, "non-wiretap," collection we were talking about two months ago.

The left was denying there was anything to these stories in the New York Times just a few weeks ago.

Now it's ok because it's a "legal" "imperial" presidency.

Your preference for government tyranny in this country is duly noted.

0 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board