- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Police are under no obligation to protect you from harm
Posted on 3/20/17 at 6:41 am to ShortyRob
Posted on 3/20/17 at 6:41 am to ShortyRob
quote:
Basically. OP is saying that stopping assault isn't "protecting" people.
Wrong.
Go to any self defense or concealed class in your area and see if the instructors tell you that the police are there to protect you and report back.
2
Posted on 3/20/17 at 6:43 am to weagle99
Plus, some of you are clueless if you think this case won't be used in the Sam Jose situation.
Posted on 3/20/17 at 6:55 am to weagle99
quote:
Go to any self defense or concealed class in your area and see if the instructors tell you that the police are there to protect you and report back.
Repeating your silliness doesn't make it less stupid.
They were under obligation to stop the crimes they were WITNESSING if they were able.
Saying, "but that's not protecting" is a distinction without a difference in the thread you chimed in on.
You just thought it made you look smart. It didn't. It makes you look like a rube.
The case in the OP was not a case of police ignoring action while they were on site.
You look like an idiot for holding on to this
This post was edited on 3/20/17 at 6:56 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News