Started By
Message

re: Police are under no obligation to protect you from harm

Posted on 3/20/17 at 6:33 am to
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 6:33 am to
quote:


Their duty is to enforce the law, which includes prohibitions against assault.

What a stupid and irrelevant line of argument

Basically. OP is saying that stopping assault isn't "protecting" people.

This genius line of thought makes OP believe he's got some key special insight.

Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 6:39 am to
I addressed your example in my comment above about assault.

And I have never commented in the San Jose case.

I assume you think the Supreme Court ruling on this topic didn't happen?
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 6:41 am to
quote:

Basically. OP is saying that stopping assault isn't "protecting" people.



Wrong.

Go to any self defense or concealed class in your area and see if the instructors tell you that the police are there to protect you and report back.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram