Started By
Message

re: Police are under no obligation to protect you from harm

Posted on 3/20/17 at 6:16 am to
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 6:16 am to
I never said they aren't supposed to enforce the law, which can be a distinction with a difference.

People in the other thread started blathering about how protecting people 'was their job.' It isn't.
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 8:33 am to
quote:

I never said they aren't supposed to enforce the law, which can be a distinction with a difference.

People in the other thread started blathering about how protecting people 'was their job.' It isn't.


This doesn't even make sense. the case you cited literally has nothing to do with San Joes. No court would find that police who are standing right there provident security do not have an obligation to protect the people at that event.

Posted by RBWilliams8
Member since Oct 2009
53418 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 8:43 am to
You're the only one blabbering, guy. It is against the law to assault someone. They are there to enforce the law. They let people break the law right in front of their face which resulted in harming citizens.

You're citing an irrelevant incident to try to spin your way out of looking retarded. Your response thread confirmed that you are, in fact, retarded.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram