Started By
Message

re: Let's talk about military spending

Posted on 3/20/17 at 1:19 pm to
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

No, there has been plenty of that. You not liking it doesn't mean it hasn't been posted.


I just scanned the first ten pages and the one thing I see that was concrete was not allowing enlisted members to marry until they were E-6. That is bound to improve recruitment and retention.

As I said a little while ago there is no -reason- for this idea to be desirable to the powers that be, and there would be huge push back from many sources including USA and USAF flag officers, who could martial a lot of back channel flak for something that no one really wants to do except a few dreamers on a message board.
This post was edited on 3/20/17 at 1:25 pm
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 1:20 pm to
You are a stupid
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
73285 posts
Posted on 3/20/17 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

I just scanned the first ten pages


Yeah, I'm not surprised.

quote:

desirable to the powers that be


That's right, move those goalposts.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram