- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Another Obama appointee blocks Trump Travel ban.. same language as 1st judge
Posted on 3/16/17 at 10:10 am to Jjdoc
Posted on 3/16/17 at 10:10 am to Jjdoc
The ban is stupid, pointless, and will not have any positive effect.
Having said that, the blatantly partisan response by these judges to Trumps orders is disturbing to say the least.
"I'm a judge and I think Trump really means it's a Muslim ban, so I'm going to block it." That a legal professional could utter those words, with the knowledge that the overwhelming number of Muslims in the world are completely unaffected by these orders, is sickening.
Having said that, the blatantly partisan response by these judges to Trumps orders is disturbing to say the least.
"I'm a judge and I think Trump really means it's a Muslim ban, so I'm going to block it." That a legal professional could utter those words, with the knowledge that the overwhelming number of Muslims in the world are completely unaffected by these orders, is sickening.
6
Posted on 3/16/17 at 10:14 am to Centinel
perhaps Trump should not trot out surrogates that say...
Trump asked me how we could ban Muslims legally (paraphrasing).
and then trot out a Muslim ban.
if the country of origin is the issue why dont we ban countries like France and England, Belgium and Germany where Muslim terrorist hidden within refugees would have an easier route to get to America.
Trump asked me how we could ban Muslims legally (paraphrasing).
and then trot out a Muslim ban.
if the country of origin is the issue why dont we ban countries like France and England, Belgium and Germany where Muslim terrorist hidden within refugees would have an easier route to get to America.
Posted on 3/16/17 at 10:17 am to Centinel
quote:
The ban is stupid, pointless, and will not have any positive effect.
Well sir, that's YOUR opinion.
quote:
Having said that, the blatantly partisan response by these judges to Trumps orders is disturbing to say the least.
The same language.... It shows collusion.
quote:
"I'm a judge and I think Trump really means it's a Muslim ban, so I'm going to block it." That a legal professional could utter those words, with the knowledge that the overwhelming number of Muslims in the world are completely unaffected by these orders, is sickening.
Correct.
Posted on 3/16/17 at 10:20 am to Centinel
quote:
"I'm a judge and I think Trump really means it's a Muslim ban, so I'm going to block it." That a legal professional could utter those words, with the knowledge that the overwhelming number of Muslims in the world are completely unaffected by these orders, is sickening.
It is a bastardization of the entire legal system to its very core, not to mention an affront to the very system of checks and balances. This issue needs to be dragged before SCOTUS as soon as possible. Although knowing the activist judges on that bench, it will likely end up in a 4-4 split confirming the jacked up 9th Circuit.
Posted on 3/16/17 at 10:28 am to Centinel
quote:
I'm a judge and I think Trump really means it's a Muslim ban, so I'm going to block it." That a legal professional could utter those words, with the knowledge that the overwhelming number of Muslims in the world are completely unaffected by these orders, is sickening.
Or maybe they're considering the "there shall be no religious test" constitutional thingy.
Posted on 3/16/17 at 10:42 am to Centinel
quote:
the blatantly partisan response by these judges to Trumps orders is disturbing to say the least.
"I'm a judge and I think Trump really means it's a Muslim ban, so I'm going to block it." That a legal professional could utter those words, with the knowledge that the overwhelming number of Muslims in the world are completely unaffected by these orders, is sickening.
That's the most jarring thing to me. Like I said in the last thread, we've truly reached the point in the legal and intelligence communities where scoring points for your side is more important than national security and sovereignty. USUALLY, no matter how partisan sane folks are, they'll draw the line at the criteria.
Posted on 3/16/17 at 11:57 am to Centinel
quote:
The ban is stupid, pointless, and will not have any positive effect.
Having said that, the blatantly partisan response by these judges to Trumps orders is disturbing to say the least.
"I'm a judge and I think Trump really means it's a Muslim ban, so I'm going to block it." That a legal professional could utter those words, with the knowledge that the overwhelming number of Muslims in the world are completely unaffected by these orders, is sickening.
The ban only applies to muslim majority countries, and no one in the US has ever been killed by a terrorist from those countries. Meanwhile, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan are NOT on the list despite nearly all terrorists to attack in the US coming from one of those three. No reasonable person could possible conclude that the motivation for this ban is national security.
Even if he'd never said a word about a muslim ban during the election, it'd be obvious what this was really about. Of course, the fact that Trump DID repeatedly promise a muslim ban during the campaign is absolutely relevant to the case, so there's no reason the judges shouldn't mention it in their decisions.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News