Gordon Chang - America's Anti Missile Defense System has a 56% failure rate

So we've failed to stop incoming missiles 56% of the time?

Sounds like fear mongering to get more govt money. Just go in and kill tater tot and most senior officials
If they get that capability.

Wouldn't be shocked. Just as a physics problem its absurdly tough even pre MIRV.

Most of the publicized successful tests were pretty hilariously rigged.

Hell, I'm happy it's as high as 56%.

It beats the shite out of the 0% chance we had of shooting down icbm's in the Cold War days.

We can and should get better at this. I think we should invest bigtime in this technology.

Well, during Gulf War 1 against Saddam, the Patriot system had only tested as something like 40-50%. It did better when actually needed though.

A quick Google shows 70% in Saudi Arabia and 40% in Israel.

That's against a slow moving SCUD. I would not expect much better results for another system against much faster ICBM's. But, that's one of the reasons for a huge military budget.

How much spending till we do get a missile defense system that can ensure we as a nation don't get hit by ANY enemy? Where do we cut that off?

quote:

---

Gordon Chang author of "Nuclear Showdown" said that we have anti missile defense systems in California and Alaska that have a 56% failure rate and that North Korea will be able to hold America ransom once it attaches nuclear warheads to their ICBMs.

---

So why don't we shoot 2-3 missiles at an inbound warhead.. mathematically that should be a guarantee..

quote:

---

This cant be accurate can it?

---

It is accurate if we are to believe NYT who wrote a long piece about this a while back. They quoted a similar figure if memory serves. Yeah, just found it:

quote:

---

The decision to intensify the cyber and electronic strikes, in early 2014, came after Mr. Obama concluded that the $300 billion spent since the Eisenhower era on traditional antimissile systems, often compared to hitting “a bullet with a bullet,” had failed the core purpose of protecting the continental United States. Flight tests of interceptors based in Alaska and California had an overall failure rate of 56 percent, under near-perfect conditions. Privately, many experts warned the system would fare worse in real combat.

---

I recommend reading the entire article. We are in some serious shite with NK: LINK

What I do know was the air defense artillery used to take down mortar rounds that were fired on a fob I was at only worked about 45-50% of the time. That was on 2013

44% is better than nothing. Shooting fast missile can't be easy.