Started By
Message

re: Scott Pruitt says carbon dioxide is not a primary contributor to global warming

Posted on 3/9/17 at 3:48 pm to
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Promising start to what? What will the real life, observable changes consist of? It took 100 years to raise the temp a supposed .8 of (1) degree. How fast will these temperatures fall and what are you basing that timeline on?
Emissions controls, an arrest in temperature rise, and it would probably take several centuries absent geoengineering (based on the rate in which the CO2 could be re-absorbed from the atmosphere by deep ocean circulation and rock weathering).
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 3/9/17 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

Emissions controls, an arrest in temperature rise, and it would probably take several centuries absent geoengineering (based on the rate in which the CO2 could be re-absorbed from the atmosphere by deep ocean circulation and rock weathering).


Why bother? What are you afraid will happen?

What are some more immediate and serious problems facing mankind now and in the near future? Where does "global warming" fall on that list?
This post was edited on 3/9/17 at 4:16 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram