- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lynch could have surveilled Trump for 7 days prior to FISA warrant rejection
Posted on 3/6/17 at 1:17 pm to joshnorris14
Posted on 3/6/17 at 1:17 pm to joshnorris14
Only after immediate notification to a FISA judge and then subsequent application.
What's the problem here?
Most warrant/wiretapping laws provide from cases where exigent circumstances exist. The fruits of the search are worthless if the judge does not ultimately sign off.
What's the problem here?
Most warrant/wiretapping laws provide from cases where exigent circumstances exist. The fruits of the search are worthless if the judge does not ultimately sign off.
4
Posted on 3/6/17 at 1:19 pm to Decatur
quote:
What's the problem here?
The problem is that Loretta Lynch could have spied on the future President, during a campaign, without even getting a warrant.
Posted on 3/6/17 at 1:20 pm to Decatur
quote:
What's the problem here?
Spying on a political campaign during an election under the guise that they are some kind of foreign operative harmful to national security.
You know...the Nixonesque shite that the Obama DOJ pulled to help do oppo research for Clinton during the most critical days of her campaign.
I guess you are okay with that since it was Democrats abusing their power this time.
This post was edited on 3/6/17 at 1:21 pm
Posted on 3/6/17 at 1:21 pm to Decatur
quote:
The fruits of the search are worthless if the judge does not ultimately sign off.
In criminal cases perhaps but a political campaign is a bit different. You leak what you discover and reap the rewards.
Posted on 3/6/17 at 1:22 pm to Decatur
quote:
Most warrant/wiretapping laws provide from cases where exigent circumstances exist. The fruits of the search are worthless if the judge does not ultimately sign off.
It's so cute how you lying assholes are going to act like the only thing those sitting in power might derive or even want to derive from eavesdropping is legally actionable Intel.
Yeah. Let's just pretend that's all that opposition candidates might find useful when granted the ability to monitor on their opponents.
Sheesh you people are fricking scum.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News