- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Should immigration enforcement be given to the states?
Posted on 2/14/17 at 10:02 pm to crazy4lsu
Posted on 2/14/17 at 10:02 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
And you want to speed it up?
The United States would cease as an economic entity if each state was responsible for its own border security.
Like I said, there doesn't need to be a consensus on immigration. The law is fairly clear.
It would still be the U.S. and companies would still be afforded the ability to go across state borders with no tariffs or additional taxes. This would just apply for immigration.
What do you think about the fact that many states have agricultural inspection stations at the state lines? I know Florida has one for every major instate entrance that trucks are required to enter. You're okay with that but not okay with the same type of system for immigration?
1
Posted on 2/14/17 at 10:05 pm to AnarchySupporter
quote:
It would still be the U.S. and companies would still be afforded the ability to go across state borders with no tariffs or additional taxes. This would just apply for immigration.
It sounds like pre-Maastricht Treaty Europe actually.
quote:
You're okay with that but not okay with the same type of system for immigration?
People are different than crops, unless you are suggesting something like Soylent Green to go along with this immigration plan.
This post was edited on 2/14/17 at 10:10 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News