Started By
Message

re: Should immigration enforcement be given to the states?

Posted on 2/14/17 at 9:51 pm to
Posted by AnarchySupporter
Member since Dec 2016
383 posts
Posted on 2/14/17 at 9:51 pm to
Some of you all really need to learn about this thing called READING! READ the post, I addressed all of these concerns in the original post. Each state would set up their own border security. So sure California could allow anyone in, but once they would try to go to Arizona or to another state by air they would be met by border security and customs. Each state would have its own border security if they elected to as well as their own customs.

So if Arizona wanted to people from California would have to go through the same process as someone going from the U.S. and Canada. If someone was a California resident and overstayed their visa in Arizona they would get sent back to California and not be allowed back in to Arizona. Very simple solutions people.
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 2/14/17 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

Each state would set up their own border security.
The "Constitutional right to freedom of movement" you anarchists often refer to actually goes back to a decision involving the U.S. Secretary of State and freedom to travel between the states.

The result was that immigration checkpoints between the states are illegal under Constitutional law.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram