- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
SNL has changed A LOT over the years-remember Norm MacDonald and Clintons?
Posted on 2/10/17 at 9:26 pm
Posted on 2/10/17 at 9:26 pm
LINK
I know its satire, but it really shows how the Clinton's were constantly in scandal. Amazing how SNL would rather be dead than speak out against HRC.
I know its satire, but it really shows how the Clinton's were constantly in scandal. Amazing how SNL would rather be dead than speak out against HRC.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 11:42 pm to tiggerthetooth
The difference there is the difference between Norm MacDonald and Seth Myers.
Norm MacDonald was pretty apolitical, but said he believed Reagan was a great president.
Seth Myers is just another stereotypical 2017 libtard. At least we have him to thank for President Trump.
Norm MacDonald was pretty apolitical, but said he believed Reagan was a great president.
Seth Myers is just another stereotypical 2017 libtard. At least we have him to thank for President Trump.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:05 am to tiggerthetooth
quote:While they may have gone further left, could it also be that in a campaign, there are two choices of candidates to mock, rather than only the person in power between campaigns?
Amazing how SNL would rather be dead than speak out against HRC.
Besides, Trump is a far more interesting person than Hillary, and his public persona, is far more quirky than Hillary's lack of one.
So when choosing to mock someone, would you rather choose the person who is boisterous with little filter, even participating in WWE, or the person who is unsocial with very little personality and just plain boring?
Posted on 2/11/17 at 12:07 am to tiggerthetooth
quote:
I know its satire, but it really shows how the Clinton's were constantly in scandal. Amazing how SNL would rather be dead than speak out against HRC.
I mean they weren't exactly making fun of Romney at this point in 2013.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 1:16 am to tiggerthetooth
SNL is shite. Like Colbert. Smarmy milquetoast with a hint of cheese. Try hard but only smelly underarms appreciate the burnt wire humor.
You granolas understand!
You granolas understand!
This post was edited on 2/11/17 at 1:19 am
Posted on 2/11/17 at 1:33 am to tiggerthetooth
Are people actually pretending that SNL is being hilariously satirical and not attacking the President?
Posted on 2/11/17 at 1:38 am to tiggerthetooth
There's another compilation that goes about 25 minutes. Savage.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 2:18 am to tiggerthetooth
Yes it sure has. It used to be funny and have talented comedians and writers.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 7:08 am to tiggerthetooth
I've watched SNL for 40 years. Some great years, some really awful. The age of the DVR made it easy to check it out each week. This year I finally decided to turn it off and stop looking. Not just because I don't agree with their complete fealty to HRC and the democrats. - though that was a big part of it. I really turned it off because it is simply not funny anymore - at all. It seems there is no escape from radical liberal hysteria...sports...comedy...you name it. Sad.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 7:14 am to tiggerthetooth
No talent at SNL anymore
Posted on 2/11/17 at 7:44 am to tiggerthetooth
With all the people that mysteriously die after coming in contact with the Clintons I don't blame SNL for steering clear
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News